A privilege log is a critical document used in legal proceedings to identify information that is withheld on the grounds of privilege, such as attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine. Preparing a privilege log effectively not only ensures compliance with legal standards but also withstands scrutiny from opposing parties and courts.
Understanding the Purpose of Preparing a Privilege Log
The primary purpose of a privilege log is to provide sufficient information to demonstrate why specific documents or communications are protected while avoiding unnecessary disclosure of privileged details. It strikes a balance between transparency and the protection of sensitive legal communications.
Key Elements of a Privilege Log
To meet legal standards, a privilege log typically includes the following elements:
- Document identification: Assign a unique identifier to each item, such as a Bates number or sequential entry.
- Date: Record the date the document or communication was created.
- Author(s): Identify the person(s) who created or authored the document.
- Recipient(s): List all recipients, including those copied (cc) or blind copied (bcc).
- Document type: Specify the type of document (e.g., email, memorandum, report).
- Privilege basis: Clearly state the reason for withholding the document, such as attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine.
- Brief description: Provide a concise description of the document’s subject matter without revealing privileged content.
Best Practices for Preparing a Privilege Log
Start Early and Stay Organized – Preparing a privilege log should begin as soon as the document collection and review processes start. You can also use document management tools to categorize and flag potentially privileged documents early in the review process. Maintaining an organized system reduces the risk of errors and oversights.
Leverage Technology – eDiscovery tools equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) along with experienced users can narrow down the identification of privileged documents and streamline the creation of privilege logs. These tools can also detect and flag inconsistencies.
Use Consistent Language – Ensure that descriptions and privilege bases are written using consistent terminology. Inconsistencies can invite challenges from opposing parties and complicate the court’s review.
Avoid Overbroad Claims – While it may be tempting to assert privilege broadly, doing so can lead to scrutiny or even waiver of privilege for some documents. Be specific and precise about the basis for withholding each document.
Collaborate with Legal Teams – Work closely with attorneys and other legal professionals to ensure that privilege claims are valid and well-documented. Regular collaboration ensures that the log accurately reflects the legal reasoning behind each entry.
Review and Quality Check – Before finalizing a privilege log, conduct a thorough review to identify and correct any errors, inconsistencies, or omissions. A detailed quality check can prevent challenges and reduce the likelihood of court-imposed sanctions.
Common Challenges and How to Address Them
- Ambiguity in descriptions: Striking the right balance between providing enough detail and preserving privilege can be challenging. Collaborate with legal counsel to craft precise yet protective descriptions.
- Large volumes of data: For cases involving extensive documentation, using efficient attorney teams and technology to manage and organize data efficiently.
- Evolving legal standards: Staying informed about jurisdictional rules and updates related to privilege logs to ensure compliance.
A well-prepared privilege log is a cornerstone of effective litigation strategy, demonstrating diligence and compliance with discovery obligations. By following best practices such as early preparation, leveraging technology, and maintaining precision and consistency, legal teams can create privilege logs that withstand scrutiny while safeguarding sensitive information. In an era of increasing data complexity, a meticulous approach to privilege log preparation is essential for success in litigation and legal compliance. For privilege review support, contact Baer Reed today.









Mr. Reyes graduated with honors from the Ateneo de Manila University, where he received the Procter and Gamble Student Excellence Award. He obtained his Juris Doctor degree from the Ateneo de Manila School of Law. During law school, Mr. Reyes was part of the Philippine delegation to the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot held in Vienna, Austria. He was also a member of the Ateneo Society of International Law and the St. Thomas More Debate Society. He completed his internship at the Public Attorney’s Office. He wrote a thesis entitled: “To Kill A White Elephant: An Analysis of the Fiduciary Exception to the Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege”. Mr. Reyes is admitted to practice law in the Philippines and the State of New York.
Ms. Lardizabal-Manzano is a graduate of San Sebastian College-Recoletos, where she earned her B.A. in Political Science. In 2003, she received her law degree from Lyceum of the Philippines and was admitted to practice law in 2004.
Matthew Hersh earned a B.A. in Political Science from Columbia University in 1990 and graduated cum laude from Georgetown University Law Center in 1999. He also holds a master’s degree in international relations from the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service.
Cap. Avi Levak (Res. IDF) graduated from from Israel’s prestigious Ben-Gurion University of the Negev with a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Mathematics. He is also a Leadership and Communication coach trained in TuT coaching by Alon gal in Israel. Avi specializes in high-level, in-depth analysis of business and client needs, within systems and software strategy and architecture.
Ms. Tyler graduated cum laude from Georgetown University and received her law degree, cum laude, from Georgetown University Law Center. During law school, she interned at the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. She also worked on The Tax Lawyer journal and was a member of the award-winning Barristers’ Council Mock Trial Team. Ms. Tyler is admitted to practice law in the State of California and the District of Columbia.
Ms. Cruz-Anonuevo graduated cum laude and top nine in her batch from Miriam College with a degree of Bachelor of Arts in InternationalStudies. She obtained her Juris Doctor degree from Ateneo de Manila University School of Law in Rockwell. During law school, she interned in Rivera, Santos, Maranan & Associates. She was also part of Ateneo’s Labor Law Bar Operations. She wrote her thesis on, “Stealing Privacy: Limitations on Media’s Photographic Invasion.,” Ms. Cruz-Anonuevo is admitted to practice law in the Philippines.
Ms. Aquino-Batallones obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in Development Studies (with Minors in Global Politics and Hispanic Studies) from the Ateneo de Manila University. In 2011, she received her Juris Doctor degree from Ateneo de Manila University School of Law. During law school, she interned at Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & de los Angeles then became an intern of Ateneo Legal Services Center’s Clinical Legal Education Program.
Mr. De Guzman graduated from San Beda College with a degree of Bachelor of Arts Major in Economics and received his law degree from San Beda College of Law. He is multilingual and is fluent in three languages: Chinese, Filipino, and English. He was admitted to the Philippine Bar in 2003.